|
Parity?
Jun 18, 2012 8:22:45 GMT 10
Post by Bundy on Jun 18, 2012 8:22:45 GMT 10
Watching the utes this weekend and couldn't help that the Fords were just so much quicker down the straight and get far better drive off the corners. What is the go with that? Thought they would have got on top of it by now...
|
|
|
Parity?
Oct 21, 2012 13:03:09 GMT 10
Post by Bundy on Oct 21, 2012 13:03:09 GMT 10
With Ford taking 16 of the 19 races this year, you have to really ask why something hasn't been done to bring the Holden and Ford utes more closer in performance?
|
|
|
Parity?
Oct 26, 2012 8:19:12 GMT 10
Post by Raptorman on Oct 26, 2012 8:19:12 GMT 10
The FG has a better designed front suspension, which in turn the Commodore technically has better rear suspension as its an IRS rear end and not a solid axle like the Falcon.
They probably need a slight parity adjustment but for the time being, despite the fact that it is a Ford walkover, the racing is still great.
|
|